Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012316›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010

The value of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in surgical management of breast carcinoma.

Calogero Cipolla, Daniela Cabibi, Salvatore Fricano, Salvatore Vieni, Irene Gentile, Mario Adelfio Latteri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Follow-up after intraoperative sentinel node biopsy of N0 neck oral cancer patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Calogero CipollaDepartment of Oncology, Division of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Palermo, AOUP Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy. calogerocipolla@virgilio.it
Daniela Cabibi
Salvatore Fricano
Salvatore Vieni
Irene Gentile
Mario Adelfio Latteri
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn breast cancer staging, the need for intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation has still not been adequately established. This study investigates the impact of intraoperative frozen section (FS) evaluation of SLN to avoid subsequent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with positive SLN.

methodsA retrospective review of 364 breast cancer patients undergoing SLN biopsy with intraoperative FS evaluation of SLN was performed.

resultsSensitivity and accuracy of FS examination of SLN were 76.4% and 94.2%, respectively. The sensitivity was significantly higher in larger tumors (p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between FS and histologic type. A second intervention was avoided in 83.9% of the patients with positive SLN.

conclusionsIntraoperative FS examination of the SLN is a useful predictor of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. The majority of SLN-positive patients allows for immediate ALND in a one-stage surgical procedure.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansIntraoperative PeriodLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph Nodes

Identifiers

PMID20012316
OpenAlexW2042317956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.