Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012172›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2009

Urothelial carcinoma: stem cells on the edge.

William D Brandt, William Matsui, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Xiaobing He, Shizhang Ling, Edward M Schaeffer, David M Berman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bladder Cancer Stem-Like Cells: Their Origin and Therapeutic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Cell adhesion and urothelial bladder cancer: the role of cadherin switching and related phenomena.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William D BrandtDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
William Matsui
Jonathan E Rosenberg
Xiaobing He
Shizhang Ling
Edward M Schaeffer
David M Berman
Johns Hopkins University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP01CA077664 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 1999 to 2009
$8.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE PATHOBIOLOGY OF CANCERT32CA067751 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GABRIELSON, EDWARD W. · 1996 to 2011
$4.0M
Hedgehog signaling links bladder injury and cancerR01DK072000 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BERMAN, DAVID MONTY · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA077664NCI NIH HHS P01CA077664NCI NIH HHS T32 CA067751NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072000NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK072000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors are heterogeneous collections of cells with highly variable abilities to survive, grow, and metastasize. This variability likely stems from epigenetic and genetic influences, either stochastic or hardwired by cell type-specific lineage programs. That differentiation underlies tumor cell heterogeneity was elegantly demonstrated in hematopoietic tumors, in which rare primitive cells (cancer stem cells (CSCs)) resembling normal hematopoietic stem cells are ultimately responsible for tumor growth and viability. Because of the compelling clinical implications CSCs pose--across the entire spectrum of cancers--investigators applied the CSC model to cancers arising in tissues with crudely understood differentiation programs. Instead of relying on differentiation, these studies used empirically selected markers and statistical arguments to identify CSCs. The empirical approach has stimulated important questions about "stemness" in cancer cells as well as the validity and stoichiometry of CSC assays. The recent identification of urothelial differentiation programs in urothelial carcinomas (UroCas) supports the idea that solid epithelial cancers (carcinomas) develop and differentiate analogously to normal epithelia and provides new insights about the spatial localization and molecular makeup of carcinoma CSCs. Importantly, CSCs from invasive UroCas (UroCSCs) appear well situated to exchange important signals with adjacent stroma, to escape immune surveillance, and to survive cytotoxic therapy. These signals have potential roles in treatment resistance and many participate in druggable cellular pathways. In this review, we discuss the implications of these findings in understanding CSCs and in better understanding how UroCas form, progress, and should be treated.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, PapillaryCarcinoma, Transitional CellCell DifferentiationCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMiceNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplastic Stem CellsStromal CellsTumor EscapeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20012172
PMCPMC2930269
OpenAlexW2089870535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.