Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20011534›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Bi-directional SIFT predicts a subset of activating mutations.

William Lee, Yan Zhang, Kiran Mukhyala, Robert A Lazarus, Zemin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analysis of the rhesus macaque (Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Rare Mutation in SPLUNC1 Affects Bacterial Adherence and Invasion in Meningococcal Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William LeeDepartment of Bioinformatics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Yan Zhang
Kiran Mukhyala
Robert A Lazarus
Zemin Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in sequencing technologies have empowered recent efforts to identify polymorphisms and mutations on a global scale. The large number of variations and mutations found in these projects requires high-throughput tools to identify those that are most likely to have an impact on function. Numerous computational tools exist for predicting which mutations are likely to be functional, but none that specifically attempt to identify mutations that result in hyperactivation or gain-of-function. Here we present a modified version of the SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant) algorithm that utilizes protein sequence alignments with homologous sequences to identify functional mutations based on evolutionary fitness. We show that this bi-directional SIFT (B-SIFT) is capable of identifying experimentally verified activating mutants from multiple datasets. B-SIFT analysis of large-scale cancer genotyping data identified potential activating mutations, some of which we have provided detailed structural evidence to support. B-SIFT could prove to be a valuable tool for efforts in protein engineering as well as in identification of functional mutations in cancer.

Indexed as

SoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularMutationNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20011534
PMCPMC2788704
OpenAlexW2077971859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.