Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20010612›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010

The impact of a noise reduction quality improvement project upon sound levels in the open-unit-design neonatal intensive care unit.

W F Liu, NIC/Q 2005 Physical Environment Exploratory Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contextual factors influencing the implementation of the obstetrics hemorrhage initiative in Florida.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W F LiuDepartment of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Southwest Florida, Fort Myers, FL 33908, USA. william.liu.md@leememorial.org
NIC/Q 2005 Physical Environment Exploratory Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo decrease measured sound levels in the neonatal intensive care unit through implementation of human factor and minor design modification strategies. STUDY

designProspective time series. Two open-unit-design neonatal centers.

resultImplementation of a coordinated program of noise reduction strategies did not result in any measurable improvement in levels of loudness or quiet.

conclusionTwo centers, using primarily human behavior noise reduction strategies, were unable to demonstrate measurable improvements in sound levels within the occupied open-unit-design neonatal intensive care unit.

Indexed as

NoiseHospital Design and ConstructionHumansIntensive Care Units, Neonatal

Identifiers

PMID20010612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.