Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20009545›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2009

Plant defensins: defense, development and application.

Henrik U Stotz, James G Thomson, Yueju Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ectopic Expression ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bioinformatic and Phenotypic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik U StotzJulius-von-Sachs-Institut fuer Biowissenschaften, Pharmazeutische Biologie, Biozentrum, Universitaet Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
James G Thomson
Yueju Wang
Agricultural Research Service · USMiddle Georgia State College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant defensins are small, highly stable, cysteine-rich peptides that constitute a part of the innate immune system primarily directed against fungal pathogens. Biological activities reported for plant defensins include antifungal activity, antibacterial activity, proteinase inhibitory activity and insect amylase inhibitory activity. Plant defensins have been shown to inhibit infectious diseases of humans and to induce apoptosis in a human pathogen. Transgenic plants overexpressing defensins are strongly resistant to fungal pathogens. Based on recent studies, some plant defensins are not merely toxic to microbes but also have roles in regulating plant growth and development.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsDefensinsEnzyme InhibitorsHumansInfectionsInsectaPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsDefensinsEnzyme InhibitorsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20009545
PMCPMC2819505
OpenAlexW2085021557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.