Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20008784›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Evaluation of WLBU2 peptide and 3-O-octyl-sn-glycerol lipid as active ingredients for a topical microbicide formulation targeting Chlamydia trachomatis.

M C Skinner, A O Kiselev, C E Isaacs, T A Mietzner, R C Montelaro, M F Lampe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alternative strategies forFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Concentration effects on peptide elution from pendant PEO layers.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M C SkinnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
A O Kiselev
C E Isaacs
T A Mietzner
R C Montelaro
M F Lampe
University of Washington · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

MODELS FOR TESTING CANDIDATE TOPICAL MICROBICIDES FOR CYTOTOXICITY AND ACTIVITY AR21AI076020 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LAMPE, MARY F · 2007 to 2008
$413k
NIAID NIH HHS AR21 AI076020NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI076020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical microbicides for prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) would be especially useful for women who are not able to persuade their partner(s) to take precautions. Many topical microbicides are in various stages of development, based on a variety of active ingredients. We investigated the in vitro activity of an engineered antimicrobial peptide (WLBU2) and a lipid (3-O-octyl-sn-glycerol [3-OG]) which could potentially be used as active ingredients in such a product. Using commercially available cytotoxicity reagents [Alamar Blue, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)], we first determined the toxicity of WLBU2 and 3-OG to the host cells in our assay procedure and excluded toxic concentrations from further testing. To determine activity against Chlamydia trachomatis, we used an assay previously developed by our laboratory in which chlamydial elementary bodies (EBs) were exposed to microbicides prior to contact with epithelial cells: the minimum (microbi)cidal concentration (MCC) assay. To further simulate conditions of transmission, we carried out the same assay in the presence of a simulated vaginal fluid, a simulated seminal fluid, human serum albumin, and a range of pH values which might be found in the human vagina at the time of exposure. Last, we tested WLBU2 and 3-OG in combination to determine if adding them together resulted in synergistic activity. We found that WLBU2 and 3-OG both have excellent activity in vitro against C. trachomatis and significantly more activity when added together. The simulated fluids reduced activity, but the synergy seen is good evidence that they would be effective when combined in a microbicide formulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell LineChlamydia trachomatisDrug SynergismFemaleGlyceryl EthersHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillin GAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesGlyceryl EthersL-Lactate DehydrogenasePenicillin GPolymyxin BTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesthiazolyl blueWLBU2 peptide

Identifiers

PMID20008784
PMCPMC2812176
OpenAlexW2005584984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.