Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20008740›Full record

ReviewCirculation2009

Electrophysiological challenges of cell-based myocardial repair.

Huei-Sheng Vincent Chen, Changsung Kim, Mark Mercola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Micro- and nanoscale biophysical cues for cardiovascular disease therapy.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Treatment of Oxidative Stress with Exosomes in Myocardial Ischemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Inducing Endogenous Cardiac Regeneration: Can Biomaterials Connect the Dots?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huei-Sheng Vincent ChenBurnham Institute for Medical Research, 10901 N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. hsv_chen@burnham.org
Changsung Kim
Mark Mercola

Funding

Notch function in myocardial development and homeostasisR01HL083463 · NHLBI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI MERCOLA, MARK · 2006 to 2010
$2.3M
Molecular Biology of Heart InductionR37HL059502 · NHLBI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI MERCOLA, MARK · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083463NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL059502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesClinical Trials as TopicElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID20008740
PMCPMC3293934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.