Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20008391›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Evolution: like any other science it is predictable.

Simon Conway Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Homo luzonensis and the role of homoplasy in the morphology of hominin insular species.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tempos and modes of collectivity in the history of life.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Wing Musculature Reconstruction in Extinct Flightless Auks (Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Molecular ensembles make evolution unpredictable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Introduction to 'Homology and convergence in nervous system evolution'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  19. Evolution of central pattern generators and rhythmic behaviours.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon Conway MorrisDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. sc113@esc.cam.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary biology rejoices in the diversity of life, but this comes at a cost: other than working in the common framework of neo-Darwinian evolution, specialists in, for example, diatoms and mammals have little to say to each other. Accordingly, their research tends to track the particularities and peculiarities of a given group and seldom enquires whether there are any wider or deeper sets of explanations. Here, I present evidence in support of the heterodox idea that evolution might look to a general theory that does more than serve as a tautology ('evolution explains evolution'). Specifically, I argue that far from its myriad of products being fortuitous and accidental, evolution is remarkably predictable. Thus, I urge a move away from the continuing obsession with Darwinian mechanisms, which are entirely uncontroversial. Rather, I emphasize why we should seek explanations for ubiquitous evolutionary convergence, as well as the emergence of complex integrated systems. At present, evolutionary theory seems to be akin to nineteenth-century physics, blissfully unaware of the imminent arrival of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Physics had its Newton, biology its Darwin: evolutionary biology now awaits its Einstein.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhilosophyAnimalsBiologyGenetic Variation

Identifiers

PMID20008391
PMCPMC2842699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.