Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20008376›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Effect of listening to Nellie the Elephant during CPR training on performance of chest compressions by lay people: randomised crossover trial.

L Rawlins, M Woollard, J Williams, P Hallam

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of the Use of Metronome Feedback on the Quality of Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Importance of Immediate Electronic-Based Feedback to Enhance Feedback for First-Time CPR Trainees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. The Baby Shark (Songs Heard Affecting Resuscitation Kinetics) study.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Magical manoeuvre: a 5-s instructor's intervention helps lightweight female rescuers achieve the required chest compression depth.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L RawlinsBirmingham University School of Medicine, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT.
M Woollard
J Williams
P Hallam
Coventry University · GBEast Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether listening to music during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training increases the proportion of lay people delivering chest compressions of 100 per minute.

designProspective randomised crossover trial.

settingLarge UK university.

participants130 volunteers (81 men) recruited on an opportunistic basis. Exclusion criteria included age under 18, trained health professionals, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training within the past three months.

interventionsVolunteers performed three sequences of one minute of continuous chest compressions on a skill meter resuscitation manikin accompanied by no music, repeated choruses of Nellie the Elephant (Nellie), and That's the Way (I like it) (TTW) according to a pre-randomised order.

main outcome measuresRate of chest compressions delivered (primary outcome), depth of compressions, proportion of incorrect compressions, and type of error.

resultsMedian (interquartile range) compression rates were 110 (93-119) with no music, 105 (98-107) with Nellie, and 109 (103-110) with TTW. There were significant differences within groups between Nellie v no music and Nellie v TTW (P<0.001) but not no music v TTW (P=0.055). A compression rate of between 95 and 105 was achieved with no music, Nellie, and TTW for 15/130 (12%), 42/130 (32%), and 12/130 (9%) attempts, respectively. Differences in proportions were significant for Nellie v no music and Nellie v TTW (P<0.001) but not for no music v TTW (P=0.55). Relative risk for a compression rate between 95 and 105 was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.66 to 4.80) for Nellie v no music, 0.8 (0.40 to 1.62) for TTW v no music, and 3.5 (1.97 to 6.33) for Nellie v TTW. The number needed to treat for listening to Nellie v no music was 5 (4 to 10)-that is, the number of cardiac arrests required during which lay responders listen to Nellie to facilitate one patient receiving compressions at the correct rate (v no music) would be between four and 10. A greater proportion of compressions were too shallow when participants listened to Nellie v no music (56% v 47%, P=0.022).

conclusionsListening to Nellie the Elephant significantly increased the proportion of lay people delivering compression rates at close to 100 per minute. Unfortunately it also increased the proportion of compressions delivered at an inadequate depth. As current resuscitation guidelines give equal emphasis to correct rate and depth, listening to Nellie the Elephant as a learning aid during CPR training should be discontinued. Further research is required to identify music that, when played during CPR training, increases the proportion of lay responders providing chest compressions at both the correct rate and depth.

Indexed as

MusicAdolescentAdultAgedCardiopulmonary ResuscitationChest Wall OscillationCross-Over StudiesEmergency MedicineHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20008376
PMCPMC2792674
OpenAlexW2128474786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.