Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20007256›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

Dynamically weighted clustering with noise set.

Yijing Shen, Wei Sun, Ker-Chau Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yijing ShenDepartment of Statistics at University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Wei Sun
Ker-Chau Li
Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationVarious clustering methods have been applied to microarray gene expression data for identifying genes with similar expression profiles. As the biological annotation data accumulated, more and more genes have been organized into functional categories. Functionally related genes may be regulated by common cellular signals, thus likely to be co-expressed. Consequently, utilizing the rapidly increasing functional annotation resources such as Gene Ontology (GO) to improve the performance of clustering methods is of great interest. On the opposite side of clustering, there are genes that have distinct expression profiles and do not co-express with other genes. Identification of these scattered genes could enhance the performance of clustering methods.

resultsWe developed a new clustering algorithm, Dynamically Weighted Clustering with Noise set (DWCN), which makes use of gene annotation information and allows for a set of scattered genes, the noise set, to be left out of the main clusters. We tested the DWCN method and contrasted its results with those obtained using several common clustering techniques on a simulated dataset as well as on two public datasets: the Stanford yeast cell-cycle gene expression data, and a gene expression dataset for a group of genetically different yeast segregants.

conclusionOur method produces clusters with more consistent functional annotations and more coherent expression patterns than existing clustering techniques. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID20007256
PMCPMC2815660
OpenAlexW2164011577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.