Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20006538›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2010

Acquisition of nutrients by Chlamydiae: unique challenges of living in an intracellular compartment.

Hector Alex Saka, Raphael H Valdivia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chlamydia trachomatis invasion: a duet of effectors.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Editorial:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome organization and genomics inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Akt Phosphorylation Influences Persistent Chlamydial Infection andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Comparative Genome Analysis of 33Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Proteomic Analysis ofMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020
    Article
  19. Modulation of Host Cell Metabolism byMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hector Alex SakaDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Raphael H Valdivia

Funding

Chlamydia Effector ProteinsR01AI081694 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VALDIVIA, RAPHAEL H · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Chlamydia co-option of Eukaryotic Lipid DropletsR01AI068032 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VALDIVIA, RAPHAEL H · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068032NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular pathogens that replicate within a membrane-bound vacuole, termed the 'inclusion'. From this compartment, bacteria acquire essential nutrients by selectively redirecting transport vesicles and hijacking intracellular organelles. Rerouting is achieved by several mechanisms including proteolysis-mediated fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus, recruitment of Rab GTPases and SNAREs, and translocation of cytoplasmic organelles into the inclusion lumen. Given Chlamydiae's extended coevolution with eukaryotic cells, it is likely that co-option of multiple cellular pathways is a strategy to provide redundancy in the acquisition of essential nutrients from the host and has contributed to the success of these highly adapted pathogens.

Indexed as

ChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsEukaryotic CellsHumansVacuoles

Identifiers

PMID20006538
PMCPMC3202608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.