Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20006481›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2010

TOR-dependent control of autophagy: biting the hand that feeds.

Thomas P Neufeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Role of the USP family in autophagy regulation and cancer progression.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic targeting of senescent cells in the CNS.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas P NeufeldDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. neufe003@umn.edu
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Regulation of TOR Signaling and Autophagy in DrosophilaR01GM062509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI NEUFELD, THOMAS P. · 2001 to 2013
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM62509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of autophagy in response to starvation is a highly conserved ability of eukaryotic cells, indicating a crucial and ancient role of this process in adapting to nutrient conditions. The target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway is major conduit for such signals, and in most cell types TOR activity is necessary and sufficient to suppress autophagy under favorable growth conditions. Recent studies have begun to reveal how TOR activity is regulated in response to nutritional cues, and are shedding new light on the mechanisms by which TOR controls the autophagic machinery. In addition, a variety of signals, stressors and pharmacological agents that induce autophagy independent of nutrient conditions have been identified. In some cases these signals appear to have been spliced into the core TOR pathway, whereas others are able to bypass the control mechanisms regulated by TOR. Increasing evidence is pointing to an important role for both positive and negative feedback loops in controlling this pathway, leading to an emerging view that TOR signaling not only regulates autophagy but is also highly sensitive to cellular rates of autophagy and other TOR-dependent processes.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID20006481
PMCPMC2854204
OpenAlexW2039366561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.