Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20006139›Full record

ReviewVaccine2009

Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for microbial diseases.

Carolyn Saylor, Ekaterina Dadachova, Arturo Casadevall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04596098 (Immune Responses to COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04596098 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Immune Responses to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Related Infection); Isolation of Human Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Therapeutics and Vaccine Design Approaches: a Prospective Monocentric Trial With Collaborative Sample Collection.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2020 to 2022Enrolled55ConditionsSARS-CoV 2ArmsBlood sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Towards better antivenoms: navigating the road to new types of snakebite envenoming therapies.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Antimicrobial resistance: new insights and therapeutic implications.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn SaylorDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. csaylor@aecom.yu.edu
Ekaterina Dadachova
Arturo Casadevall
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007288 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI AKABAS, MYLES H. · 1985 to 2022
$35.6M
Synergy of Host Defense Mechanisms in the LungR01HL059842 · NHLBI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 1997 to 2023
$7.4M
PROTECTIVE ANTIBODIES FOR CRYPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONSR01AI033774 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 1994 to 2014
$5.6M
Molecular Characterization of C. neoformans AntibodiesR37AI033142 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 2007 to 2016
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL059842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033774NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI033142NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The monoclonal antibody (mAb) revolution that currently provides many new options for the treatment of neoplastic and inflammatory diseases has largely bypassed the field of infectious diseases. Only one mAb is licensed for use against an infectious disease, although there are many in various stages of development. This situation is peculiar given that serum therapy was one of the first effective treatments for microbial diseases and that specific antibodies have numerous antimicrobial properties. The underdevelopment and underutilization of mAb therapies for microbial diseases has various complex explanations that include the current availability of antimicrobial drugs, small markets, high costs and microbial antigenic variation. However, there are signs that the climate for mAb therapeutics in infectious diseases is changing given increasing antibiotic drug resistance, the emergence of new pathogenic microbes for which no therapy is available, and development of mAb cocktail formulations. Currently, the major hurdle for the widespread introduction of mAb therapies for microbial diseases is economic, given the high costs of immunoglobulin preparations and relatively small markets. Despite these obstacles there are numerous opportunities for mAb development against microbial diseases and the development of radioimmunotherapy provides new options for enhancing the magic bullet. Hence, there is cautious optimism that the years ahead will see more mAbs in clinical use against microbial diseases.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCommunicable DiseasesHumansImmunotherapyRadioimmunotherapyAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID20006139
PMCPMC2810317
OpenAlexW2156687094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.