Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20003269›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2009

Pharmacokinetics and lung delivery of PDDS-aerosolized amikacin (NKTR-061) in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Charles-Edouard Luyt, Marc Clavel, Kalpalatha Guntupalli, Jay Johannigman, John I Kennedy, Christopher Wood, Kevin Corkery, Dennis Gribben, Jean Chastre

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01021436 (An Open-Label, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Safety,Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Aerosolized Amikacin Delivered Via the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01021436 phase2completednot on this map

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Multinational Study to Assess the Safety,Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Aerosolized Amikacin Delivered Via the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (NKTR-061) in Intubated and Mechanically- Ventilated Patients With Nosocomial Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2007 to 2007Enrolled30ConditionsPneumoniaArmsAmikacin inhalation solution (BAY41-6551)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Charles-Edouard LuytService de Réanimation Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France. charles-edouard.luyt@psl.aphp.fr
Marc Clavel
Kalpalatha Guntupalli
Jay Johannigman
John I Kennedy
Christopher Wood
Kevin Corkery
Dennis Gribben
Jean Chastre
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBaylor College of Medicine · USHôpital Dupuytren · FRMirna Therapeutics (United States) · USNovartis (United States) · USUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAminoglycosides aerosolization might achieve better diffusion into the alveolar compartment than intravenous use. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate aerosol-delivered amikacin penetration into the alveolar epithelial lining fluid (ELF) using a new vibrating mesh nebulizer (Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS), Nektar Therapeutics), which delivers high doses to the lungs.

methodsNebulized amikacin (400 mg bid) was delivered to the lungs of 28 mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative VAP for 7-14 days, adjunctive to intravenous therapy. On treatment day 3, 30 minutes after completing aerosol delivery, all the patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage in the infection-involved area and the ELF amikacin concentration was determined. The same day, urine and serum amikacin concentrations were determined at different time points.

resultsMedian (range) ELF amikacin and maximum serum amikacin concentrations were 976.1 (135.7-16127.6) and 0.9 (0.62-1.73) microg/mL, respectively. The median total amount of amikacin excreted in urine during the first and second 12-hour collection on day 3 were 19 (12.21-28) and 21.2 (14.1-29.98) microg, respectively. During the study period, daily through amikacin measurements were below the level of nephrotoxicity. Sixty-four unexpected adverse events were reported, among which 2 were deemed possibly due to nebulized amikacin: one episode of worsening renal failure, and one episode of bronchospasm.

conclusionsPDDS delivery of aerosolized amikacin achieved very high aminoglycoside concentrations in ELF from radiography-controlled infection-involved zones, while maintaining safe serum amikacin concentrations. The ELF concentrations always exceeded the amikacin minimum inhibitory concentrations for Gram-negative microorganisms usually responsible for these pneumonias. The clinical impact of amikacin delivery with this system remains to be determined.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01021436.

Indexed as

AerosolsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansIntubationLungRespiration, ArtificialAerosolsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID20003269
PMCPMC2811890
OpenAlexW2095656393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.