Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20003211›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2009

Pressure-dependent stress relaxation in acute respiratory distress syndrome and healthy lungs: an investigation based on a viscoelastic model.

Steven Ganzert, Knut Möller, Daniel Steinmann, Stefan Schumann, Josef Guttmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reply to ButlerAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  3. Positive- and Negative-Pressure Ventilation Characterized by Local and Global Pulmonary Mechanics.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven GanzertDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Freiburg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. steven.ganzert@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Knut Möller
Daniel Steinmann
Stefan Schumann
Josef Guttmann
University Medical Center Freiburg · DENephrologisches Zentrum Villingen-Schwenningen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLimiting the energy transfer between ventilator and lung is crucial for ventilatory strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Part of the energy is transmitted to the viscoelastic tissue components where it is stored or dissipates. In mechanically ventilated patients, viscoelasticity can be investigated by analyzing pulmonary stress relaxation. While stress relaxation processes of the lung have been intensively investigated, non-linear interrelations have not been systematically analyzed, and such analyses have been limited to small volume or pressure ranges. In this study, stress relaxation of mechanically ventilated lungs was investigated, focusing on non-linear dependence on pressure. The range of inspiratory capacity was analyzed up to a plateau pressure of 45 cmH2O.

methodsTwenty ARDS patients and eleven patients with normal lungs under mechanical ventilation were included. Rapid flow interruptions were repetitively applied using an automated super-syringe maneuver. Viscoelastic resistance, compliance and time constant were determined by multiple regression analysis using a lumped parameter model. This same viscoelastic model was used to investigate the frequency dependence of the respiratory system's impedance.

resultsThe viscoelastic time constant was independent of pressure, and it did not differ between normal and ARDS lungs. In contrast, viscoelastic resistance increased non-linearly with pressure (normal: 8.4 (7.4-11.9) [median (lower - upper quartile)] to 35.2 (25.6-39.5) cmH2O.sec/L; ARDS: 11.9 (9.2-22.1) to 73.5 (56.8-98.7)cmH2O.sec/L), and viscoelastic compliance decreased non-linearly with pressure (normal: 130.1(116.9-151.3) to 37.4(34.7-46.3) mL/cmH2O; ARDS: 125.8(80.0-211.0) to 17.1(13.8-24.7)mL/cmH2O). The pulmonary impedance increased with pressure and decreased with respiratory frequency.

conclusionsViscoelastic compliance and resistance are highly non-linear with respect to pressure and differ considerably between ARDS and normal lungs. None of these characteristics can be observed for the viscoelastic time constant. From our analysis of viscoelastic properties we cautiously conclude that the energy transfer from the respirator to the lung can be reduced by application of low inspiratory plateau pressures and high respiratory frequencies. This we consider to be potentially lung protective.

Indexed as

ElasticityInspiratory CapacityLungOxygen ConsumptionPlethysmography, ImpedanceReference ValuesRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory MechanicsViscosity

Identifiers

PMID20003211
PMCPMC2811954
OpenAlexW1991806804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.