Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20001958›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2009

'Unknown' proteins and 'orphan' enzymes: the missing half of the engineering parts list--and how to find it.

Andrew D Hanson, Anne Pribat, Jeffrey C Waller, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Reverse prediction of carbohydrate esterase polysaccharide targets.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The transformative power of structural predictions with AI in plant science.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using bioinformatics for identifying and plugging metabolic pathway holes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. C11orf54 catalyzes L-xylulose formation in human metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. GlobalNature metabolism · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biosynthesis and function of 7-deazaguanine derivatives in bacteria and phages.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Detecting anomalous proteins using deep representations.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D HansonHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. adha@ufl.edu
Anne Pribat
Jeffrey C Waller
Valérie de Crécy-Lagard

Funding

Synthesis and function of Queuosine in BacteriaR01GM070641 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DE CRECY-LAGARD, VALERIE A · 2006 to 2023
$5.3M
Genomics of Coenzyme Metabolism in Bacterial PathogensR01AI066244 · NIAID · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI OSTERMAN, ANDREI L · 2007 to 2010
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI066244-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066244NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other forms of engineering, metabolic engineering requires knowledge of the components (the 'parts list') of the target system. Lack of such knowledge impairs both rational engineering design and diagnosis of the reasons for failures; it also poses problems for the related field of metabolic reconstruction, which uses a cell's parts list to recreate its metabolic activities in silico. Despite spectacular progress in genome sequencing, the parts lists for most organisms that we seek to manipulate remain highly incomplete, due to the dual problem of 'unknown' proteins and 'orphan' enzymes. The former are all the proteins deduced from genome sequence that have no known function, and the latter are all the enzymes described in the literature (and often catalogued in the EC database) for which no corresponding gene has been reported. Unknown proteins constitute up to about half of the proteins in prokaryotic genomes, and much more than this in higher plants and animals. Orphan enzymes make up more than a third of the EC database. Attacking the 'missing parts list' problem is accordingly one of the great challenges for post-genomic biology, and a tremendous opportunity to discover new facets of life's machinery. Success will require a co-ordinated community-wide attack, sustained over years. In this attack, comparative genomics is probably the single most effective strategy, for it can reliably predict functions for unknown proteins and genes for orphan enzymes. Furthermore, it is cost-efficient and increasingly straightforward to deploy owing to a proliferation of databases and associated tools.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinAnimalsEnzymesGenomicsHumansOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyProteinsProteomicsEnzymesProteins

Identifiers

PMID20001958
PMCPMC3022307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.