Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20001804›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2009

New hopes from old drugs: revisiting DNA-binding small molecules as anticancer agents.

Katerina Gurova

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Structure optimization and molecular dynamics studies of new tumor-selectiveJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dual FLT3/haspin kinase inhibitor based on 3RSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katerina GurovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. katerina.gurova@roswellpark.org
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Development of new inhibitors of androgen receptorsR41CA110400 · NCI · CLEVELAND BIOLABS, INC. · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2004 to 2004
$100k
NCI NIH HHS R41 CA110400NCI NIH HHS R42 CA 110400-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs that are broadly and successfully used today are DNA-damaging agents. Targeting of DNA has been proven to cause relatively potent and selective destruction of tumor cells. However, the clinical potential of DNA-damaging agents is limited by the adverse side effects and increased risk of secondary cancers that are consequences of the agents' genotoxicity. In this review, we present evidence that those agents capable of targeting DNA without inducing DNA damage would not be limited in these ways, and may be as potent as DNA-damaging agents in the killing of tumor cells. We use as an example literature data and our own research of the well-known antimalarial drug quinacrine, which binds to DNA without inducing DNA damage, yet modulates a number of cellular pathways that impact tumor cell survival.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDNAHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA

Identifiers

PMID20001804
PMCPMC2821823
OpenAlexW2171530299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.