Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20000359›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2010

DNA polymerase fidelity: comparing direct competition of right and wrong dNTP substrates with steady state and pre-steady state kinetics.

Jeffrey G Bertram, Keriann Oertell, John Petruska, Myron F Goodman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oxidative guanine base damage regulates human telomerase activity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2016
    Article
  8. PCR: the price of infidelity.Nature methods · 2016
    Article
  9. Kinetic selection vs. free energy of DNA base pairing in control of polymerase fidelity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey G BertramDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Keriann Oertell
John Petruska
Myron F Goodman

Funding

Mechanistic Analysis of Pol Beta and Cancer-Associated MutantsU19CA105010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2004 to 2012
$9.8M
ERROR CORRECTION IN DNA SYNTHESIS--A BIOCHEMICAL STUDYR37GM021422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2000 to 2009
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1U19CA10501NCI NIH HHS U19 CA105010NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM021422NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM21422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA polymerase fidelity is defined as the ratio of right (R) to wrong (W) nucleotide incorporations when dRTP and dWTP substrates compete at equal concentrations for primer extension at the same site in the polymerase-primer-template DNA complex. Typically, R incorporation is favored over W by 10(3)-10(5)-fold, even in the absence of 3'-exonuclease proofreading. Straightforward in principle, a direct competition fidelity measurement is difficult to perform in practice because detection of a small amount of W is masked by a large amount of R. As an alternative, enzyme kinetics measurements to evaluate k(cat)/K(m) for R and W in separate reactions are widely used to measure polymerase fidelity indirectly, based on a steady state derivation by Fersht. A systematic comparison between direct competition and kinetics has not been made until now. By separating R and W products using electrophoresis, we have successfully taken accurate fidelity measurements for directly competing R and W dNTP substrates for 9 of the 12 natural base mispairs. We compare our direct competition results with steady state and pre-steady state kinetic measurements of fidelity at the same template site, using the proofreading-deficient mutant of Klenow fragment (KF(-)) DNA polymerase. All the data are in quantitative agreement.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDeoxyribonucleotidesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IDNA PrimersKineticsMutationSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsDeoxyribonucleotidesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA Polymerase IDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID20000359
PMCPMC2803633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.