Return of "accurate" and "actionable" results: yes!

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clinical verification of genetic results returned to research participants: findings from a Colon Cancer Family Registry.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2017
   Article
2. Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2017
   Article
3. Amnestic MCI Patients' Perspectives toward Disclosure of Amyloid PET Results in a Research Context.Neuroethics · 2017
   Article
4. Next-Generation Sequencing and the Return of Results.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
   Review
5. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
   Article
6. A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2014
   Article
7. Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2013
   Article
8. Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?BMC medical genomics · 2013
   Article
9. Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions?Human genetics · 2011
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.2008

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as