ArticleTherapy (London, England : 2004)2009
Regenerative medicine strategies for treatment of neurogenic bladder.
Article in Therapy (London, England : 2004), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neurogenic bladder.Advances in urology · 2012Article
- Future of liver transplantation: non-human primates for patient-specific organs from induced pluripotent stem cells.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
- Development of bioartificial myocardium using stem cells and nanobiotechnology templates.Cardiology research and practice · 2010Article
- Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research perspectives for pediatric surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neurogenic bladder is a general term encompassing various neurologic dysfunctions in the bladder and external urethral sphincter caused by damage or disease. Therapeutic management options fall into the categories of conservative, minimally invasive or surgical. The current standard for surgical management is bladder augmentation using intestinal segments. However, because intestinal tissue possesses different functional characteristics to bladder tissue, numerous complications can ensue. Regenerative medicine uses combinations of cells and/or biomaterials to encourage regeneration of healthy tissue and offers an alternative approach for the replacement of lost or deficient organs, including the bladder. Promising results using the principles of regenerative medicine have already been obtained in children with neurogenic bladder caused by myelomeningocele. Human clinical trials, governed by the US FDA, are ongoing in the USA in both children and adults to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technology for regenerating bladders. More studies are in progress and additional advances in this field can be anticipated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.