Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19997077›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2010

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates.

Shannon Gravely-Witte, Yvonne W Leung, Rajiv Nariani, Hala Tamim, Paul Oh, Victoria M Chan, Sherry L Grace

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation among Patients Diagnosed with Cardiovascular Diseases-A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shannon Gravely-WitteFaculty of Health, 368 Norman Bethune College, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Yvonne W Leung
Rajiv Nariani
Hala Tamim
Paul Oh
Victoria M Chan
Sherry L Grace

Funding

CIHR 80489-1CIHR MSH-80489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, evidence suggests that utilization of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following indicated cardiac events is low. Referral strategies, such as automatic referral, have been advocated to improve CR utilization. In this Review, we evaluate the effects of referral strategies on rates of CR referral and enrollment. Referral strategies are categorized as 'automatic' (the use of electronic health records or systematic discharge order sets), as 'liaison' (discussions with allied health-care providers), or as 'other' (for example, the use of motivational letter to patients). The highest rates of CR referral have been achieved in studies implementing automatic referral orders, whereas the highest rates of CR enrollment have resulted from a combination of automatic and liaison methods. Overall, innovative referral strategies significantly increase CR utilization. While further investigation is needed, institutions should evaluate their CR referral practice in light of these findings.

Indexed as

Patient CompliancePractice Patterns, Physicians'Secondary PreventionElectronic Health RecordsGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeart DiseasesHumansMotivationPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as TopicReferral and ConsultationReminder Systems

Identifiers

PMID19997077
PMCPMC4474642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.