Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19996178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Dynamics of the Dorsal morphogen gradient.

Jitendra S Kanodia, Richa Rikhy, Yoosik Kim, Viktor K Lund, Robert DeLotto, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Stanislav Y Shvartsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Temporal integration of inductive cues on the way to gastrulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulation of spatiotemporal limits of developmental gene expression via enhancer grammar.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jitendra S KanodiaDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Richa Rikhy
Yoosik Kim
Viktor K Lund
Robert DeLotto
Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz
Stanislav Y Shvartsman

Funding

Organization and Dynamics of Endomembrane Pathways and OrganellesZIAHD001609 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI BONIFACINO, JUAN · 2009 to 2019
$16.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dorsoventral (DV) patterning of the Drosophila embryo depends on the nuclear localization gradient of Dorsal (Dl), a protein related to the mammalian NF-kappaB transcription factors. Current understanding of how the Dl gradient works has been derived from studies of its transcriptional interpretation, but the gradient itself has not been quantified. In particular, it is not known whether the Dl gradient is stable or dynamic during the DV patterning of the embryo. To address this question, we developed a mathematical model of the Dl gradient and constrained its parameters by experimental data. Based on our computational analysis, we predict that the Dl gradient is dynamic and, to a first approximation, can be described as a concentration profile with increasing amplitude and constant shape. These time-dependent properties of the Dl gradient are different from those of the Bicoid and MAPK phosphorylation gradients, which pattern the anterior and terminal regions of the embryo. Specifically, the gradient of the nuclear levels of Bicoid is stable, whereas the pattern of MAPK phosphorylation changes in both shape and amplitude. We attribute these striking differences in the dynamics of maternal morphogen gradients to the differences in the initial conditions and chemistries of the anterior, DV, and terminal systems.

Indexed as

Body PatterningAnimalsCell NucleusDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factorsbcd protein, Drosophiladl protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19996178
PMCPMC2799810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.