Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19995928›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Defining fractional inhibitory concentration index cutoffs for additive interactions based on self-drug additive combinations, Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and in vitro-in vivo correlation data for antifungal drug combinations against Aspergillus fumigatus.

Joseph Meletiadis, Spyros Pournaras, Emmanuel Roilides, Thomas J Walsh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Repurposing Birabresib to target Gram‑positive bacteria.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Is CepA frommSphere · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph MeletiadisLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Attikon University General Hospital, 1 Rimini Str., Haidari, Athens 124 62, Greece. jmeletiadis@med.uoa.gr
Spyros Pournaras
Emmanuel Roilides
Thomas J Walsh
National Cancer Institute · USHippocration General Hospital · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index range of 0.5 to 4 that is commonly used to define additivity results in no interactions in most combination studies of antifungal agents. These results may differ from those of in vivo studies, where positive and negative interactions may be observed. We reassessed this in vitro FIC index range based on (i) the experimental variation of the checkerboard technique using multiple replicates, (ii) the ability to correctly determine purely additive self-drug and two-drug antagonistic combinations of amphotericin B (AMB) and voriconazole (VRC), (iii) Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and (iv) in vitro-in vivo correlation using experimental models of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis against the same Aspergillus fumigatus isolate based on visual, spectrophotometric, and colorimetric determinations of FICs after 24 and 48 h of incubation. FICs obtained after 24 h of incubation ranged from 0.5 to 1.25 for the self-drug additive combinations of AMB plus AMB and VRC plus VRC and from 2.25 to 4.25 for the antagonistic combination of AMB plus VRC. Monte Carlo simulation analysis showed that self-drug combinations were correctly classified as additive and that the combination of AMB plus VRC was correctly classified as antagonistic for >85% of the simulated FICs when deviation of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of replicate FICs from the additivity range of 1 to 1.25 was used to assess interactions after 24 h. In vitro-in vivo correlation analysis showed that the 95% CIs of the FICs of the in vivo synergistic combination anidulafungin plus VRC determined after 24 h were lower than 1 and the 95% CIs of the FICs of the in vivo antagonistic combination AMB plus ravuconazole were higher than 1.25. Adequate insight into weak pharmacodynamic interactions with in vivo relevance may be obtained by demonstrating that triplicate FICs at 24 h are outside an inclusive additivity range of 1 to 1.25.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAspergillus fumigatusColorimetryConfidence IntervalsDrug Therapy, CombinationInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID19995928
PMCPMC2812160
OpenAlexW2138023605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.