Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19995808›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010

PhosSNP for systematic analysis of genetic polymorphisms that influence protein phosphorylation.

Jian Ren, Chunhui Jiang, Xinjiao Gao, Zexian Liu, Zineng Yuan, Changjiang Jin, Longping Wen, Zhaolei Zhang, Yu Xue, Xuebiao Yao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identification of IDUA and WNT16 Phosphorylation-Related Non-Synonymous Polymorphisms for Bone Mineral Density in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Studies.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian RenDepartment of Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chunhui Jiang
Xinjiao Gao
Zexian Liu
Zineng Yuan
Changjiang Jin
Longping Wen
Zhaolei Zhang
Yu Xue
Xuebiao Yao
Hefei National Center for Physical Sciences at Nanoscale · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
CIHRNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are entering the era of personalized genomics as breakthroughs in sequencing technology have made it possible to sequence or genotype an individual person in an efficient and accurate manner. Preliminary results from HapMap and other similar projects have revealed the existence of tremendous genetic variations among world populations and among individuals. It is important to delineate the functional implication of such variations, i.e. whether they affect the stability and biochemical properties of proteins. It is also generally believed that the genetic variation is the main cause for different susceptibility to certain diseases or different response to therapeutic treatments. Understanding genetic variation in the context of human diseases thus holds the promise for "personalized medicine." In this work, we carried out a genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that could potentially influence protein phosphorylation characteristics in human. Here, we defined a phosphorylation-related SNP (phosSNP) as a non-synonymous SNP (nsSNP) that affects the protein phosphorylation status. Using an in-house developed kinase-specific phosphorylation site predictor (GPS 2.0), we computationally detected that approximately 70% of the reported nsSNPs are potential phosSNPs. More interestingly, approximately 74.6% of these potential phosSNPs might also induce changes in protein kinase types in adjacent phosphorylation sites rather than creating or removing phosphorylation sites directly. Taken together, we proposed that a large proportion of the nsSNPs might affect protein phosphorylation characteristics and play important roles in rewiring biological pathways. Finally, all phosSNPs were integrated into the PhosSNP 1.0 database, which was implemented in JAVA 1.5 (J2SE 5.0). The PhosSNP 1.0 database is freely available for academic researchers.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesComputational BiologyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, BiologicalPhosphorylationProtein KinasesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinProtein KinasesProteins

Identifiers

PMID19995808
PMCPMC2860229
OpenAlexW2107889651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.