Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19995751›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2010

"Go upstream, young man": lessons learned from the p38 saga.

D Hammaker, G S Firestein

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of asthma: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress on the pathogenesis and clinical treatment of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D HammakerDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093-0656, USA. dhammaker@ucsd.edu
G S Firestein
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Regulation of p38 and inflammation by MAPK kinasesR01AI070555 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2006 to 2016
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), orally active small-molecule drugs are desirable. Signal transduction inhibitors have been the focus of intense efforts, with some recent notable successes and failures. p38alpha is a signalling molecule that regulates proinflammatory cytokines, which makes it a logical target for RA. Unfortunately, selective p38alpha inhibitors have limited efficacy. An attempt is made here to put these studies into perspective and offer possible explanations for the failure of p38alpha blockers. Alternative strategies, such as targeting kinases higher in the signalling cascade or using less selective compounds, might be more successful as suggested by the efficacy seen with Syk and JAK inhibitors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, ExperimentalArthritis, RheumatoidHumansMicep38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntirheumatic Agentsp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19995751
PMCPMC2911016
OpenAlexW2063701247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.