Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19995397›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of haematology2010

Activated protein C action in inflammation.

Pranita P Sarangi, Hyun-wook Lee, Minsoo Kim

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of haematology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Regulation of histones in thromboinflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Coagulation Profile of COVID-19 Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Targeting GαNature communications · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pranita P SarangiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, David H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Hyun-wook Lee
Minsoo Kim
University of Rochester · US

Funding

VASCULAR RELATIONS OF BLOOD CELLS AND PROTEINSP01HL018208 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WAUGH, RICHARD E · 1985 to 2014
$24.7M
LFA-1 in Lymphocyte MigrationR01HL087088 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KIM, MINSOO · 2007 to 2015
$3.8M
Regulation of neutrophil migration by Activated Protein CR21HL094797 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KIM, MINSOO · 2009 to 2010
$422k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL094797NHLBI NIH HHS HL18208NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL018208NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087088NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL094797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activated protein C (APC) is a natural anticoagulant that plays an important role in coagulation homeostasis by inactivating the procoagulation factor Va and VIIIa. In addition to its anticoagulation functions, APC also has cytoprotective effects such as anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and endothelial barrier protection. Recently, a recombinant form of human APC (rhAPC or drotrecogin alfa activated; known commercially as 'Xigris') was approved by the US Federal Drug Administration for treatment of severe sepsis associated with a high risk of mortality. Sepsis, also known as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from infection, is a serious medical condition in critical care patients. In sepsis, hyperactive and dysregulated inflammatory responses lead to secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, activation and migration of leucocytes, activation of coagulation, inhibition of fibrinolysis, and increased apoptosis. Although initial hypotheses focused on antithrombotic and profibrinolytic functions of APC in sepsis, other agents with more potent anticoagulation functions were not effective in treating severe sepsis. Furthermore, APC therapy is also associated with the risk of severe bleeding in treated patients. Therefore, the cytoprotective effects, rather than the anticoagulant effect of APC are postulated to be responsible for the therapeutic benefit of APC in the treatment of severe sepsis.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationCytoprotectionHumansInflammationMutagenesisProtein CSepsisSignal TransductionStructure-Activity RelationshipProtein C

Identifiers

PMID19995397
PMCPMC2868910
OpenAlexW2072798059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.