Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19972636›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2009

Risk factors for endoparasitism in dogs: retrospective case-control study of 6578 veterinary teaching hospital cases.

M C Gates, T J Nolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A survey of intestinal parasites in dogs from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M C GatesSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
T J Nolan

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING: STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESS. SCHOOLST35RR007065 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ATCHISON, MICHAEL LEE · 1998 to 2011
$981k
NCRR NIH HHS RR07065NCRR NIH HHS T35 RR007065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe diagnostic utility of routine faecal examinations can be greatly enhanced through an appreciation of risk factors most commonly associated with endoparasitism.

methodsFrom a sample of 6578 canine patients presenting to a veterinary teaching hospital between 1996 and 2006, this study used univariate and multi-variable techniques to examine putative signalment, medical history and demographic factors predisposing dogs to intestinal parasites.

resultsAge and median household income were the strongest predictors of endoparasitism. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endoparasites were 0.82 times smaller for every 1 year increase in age (OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.84) and for every $10,000 increase in median household income, the odds were 0.86 times lower (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.89). The variables gender, neuter status, month of diagnosis, admitting clinical service and primary diagnosis were not significant predictors. Animals that were presented for underlying medical conditions were less likely to have parasites and the presence of diarrhoea was associated with 76% lower odds of endoparasitism compared to healthy animals (OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.90). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for parasites in younger patients that live in high population density and low income neighbourhoods.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDog DiseasesDogsFecesFemaleIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMaleOdds RatioParasitic Diseases, AnimalPennsylvaniaPopulation DensityPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID19972636
PMCPMC2791909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.