ReviewThe Proceedings of the Nutrition Society2010
Plenary Lecture 2: Transcription factors, regulatory elements and nutrient-gene communication.
Review in The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cuproptosis-a potential target for the treatment of osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- The Implications of Zinc Therapy in Combating the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Review
- Impact of zinc metabolism on innate immune function in the setting of sepsis.International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition · 2010Review
- Proteomic analysis of Nrf2 deficient transgenic mice reveals cellular defence and lipid metabolism as primary Nrf2-dependent pathways in the liver.Journal of proteomics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dramatic advances have been made in the understanding of the differing molecular mechanisms used by nutrients to regulate genes that are essential for their biological roles to carry out normal metabolism. Classical studies have focused on nutrients as ligands to activate specific transcription factors. New interest has focused on histone acetylation as a process for either global or limited gene activation and is the first mechanism to be discussed. Nuclear ATP-citrate lyase generates acetyl-CoA, which has been shown to have a role in the activation of specific genes via selective histone acetylation. Transcription factor acetylation may provide a second mode of control of nutrient-responsive gene transcription. The third mechanism relates to the availability of response elements within chromatin, which as well as the location of the elements in the gene may allow or prevent transcription. A fourth mechanism involves intracellular transport of Zn ions, which can orchestrate localized enzyme inhibition-activation. This process in turn influences signalling molecules that regulate gene expression. The examples provided in the present review point to a new level of complexity in understanding nutrient-gene communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.