Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19967435›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2010

Post-soviet placebos: epistemology and authority in Russian treatments for alcoholism.

Eugene Raikhel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugene RaikhelDepartment of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago, 5730 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. eugene.raikhel@mail.mcgill.ca
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dominant modalities of treatment for alcoholism in Russia are suggestion-based methods developed by narcology-the subspecialty of Russian psychiatry which deals with addiction. A particularly popular method is the use of disulfiram-an alcohol antagonist-for which narcologists commonly substitute neutral substances. Drawing on 14 months of fieldwork at narcological clinics in St. Petersburg, this article examines the epistemological and institutional conditions which facilitate this practice of "placebo therapy." I argue that narcologists' embrace of such treatments has been shaped by a clinical style of reasoning specific to a Soviet and post-Soviet psychiatry, itself the product of contested Soviet politics over the knowledge of the mind and brain. This style of reasoning has facilitated narcologists' understanding of disulfiram as a behavioral, rather than a pharmacological, treatment and has disposed them to amplify patients' responses through attention to the performative aspects of the clinical encounter and through management of the treatment's broader reputation as an effective therapy. Moreover, such therapies have generally depended upon, and helped to reinforce, clinical encounters premised on a steeply hierarchical physician-patient relationship.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectAlcoholismHumansInterviews as TopicObservationPsychiatryRussiaSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19967435
OpenAlexW1994376420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.