Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19967350›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2010

Examining the cardiac NK-2 genes in early heart development.

Heather Bartlett, Gert Jan C Veenstra, Daniel L Weeks

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Mutational Assessment inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Existence of mutations in the homeodomain-encoding region of NKX2.5 gene in Iranian patients with tetralogy of Fallot.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather BartlettDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Bowen Science Building, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Gert Jan C Veenstra
Daniel L Weeks
University of Iowa · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Nkx2-5 and congenital heart defects in XenopusR01GM069944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEEKS, DANIEL L. · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
Interrogating the Xenopus tropicalis genome using tile path microarraysR01HD054356 · NICHD · STICHTING RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT · PI VEENSTRA, GERT JAN C. · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054356NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiac NK-2 transcription factors are the vertebrate relatives of the Drosophila tinman gene. Without the Drosophila tinman gene, fruit flies fail to form their heart ("dorsal vessel"), and mutations or altered expression of cardiac NK-2 genes may lead to abnormal heart formation in vertebrates. Although the cardiac NK-2 gene NKX2-5 is recognized as an important factor in cases of human congenital heart disease and heart development in vertebrates, the roles of the other cardiac NK-2 genes are less clear. This report reviews what is known about the cardiac NK-2 genes in cardiac development, comparing studies in several different model systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaGenes, RegulatorHeartHeart Defects, CongenitalHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5Homeodomain ProteinsHumansTranscription FactorsXenopus laevisHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5Homeodomain ProteinsNKX2-5 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19967350
PMCPMC2981039
OpenAlexW2135989284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.