Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19966307›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage.

Haibao Tang, John E Bowers, Xiyin Wang, Andrew H Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genus-Wide Pan-Genome Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Chromosome Ordinal Number-Related Genomic Stability Revealed AmongInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Poaceae Cytokinin Response RegulatorInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Evolution of Plant Genome Size and Composition.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024
    Review

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haibao TangPlant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
John E Bowers
Xiyin Wang
Andrew H Paterson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the timing and extent of a whole-genome duplication occurring in the common lineage of most modern cereals are clear, the existence or extent of more ancient genome duplications in cereals and perhaps other monocots has been hinted at, but remain unclear. We present evidence of additional duplication blocks of deeper hierarchy than the pancereal rho (rho) duplication, covering at least 20% of the cereal transcriptome. These more ancient duplicated regions, herein called sigma, are evident in both intragenomic and intergenomic analyses of rice and sorghum. Resolution of such ancient duplication events improves the understanding of the early evolutionary history of monocots and the origins and expansions of gene families. Comparisons of syntenic blocks reveal clear structural similarities in putatively homologous regions of monocots (rice) and eudicots (grapevine). Although the exact timing of the sigma-duplication(s) is unclear because of uncertainties of the molecular clock assumption, our data suggest that it occurred early in the monocot lineage after its divergence from the eudicot clade.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, PlantPolyploidyAlgorithmsChromosomes, PlantDNA Repeat ExpansionEdible GrainEvolution, MolecularGenes, PlantMagnoliopsidaModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataOryzaPhylogenySorghumSynteny

Identifiers

PMID19966307
PMCPMC2806719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.