Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19963286›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2010

Molecular basis of pharmacotherapies for cognition in Down syndrome.

Katheleen J Gardiner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long noncoding RNAGenes & diseases · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Down Syndrome: Current Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katheleen J GardinerDepartment of Pediatrics, Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research Center, Human Medical Genetics and Neuroscience Programs, University of Colorado Denver, 12800 E 19(th) Avenue, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. katheleen.gardiner@ucdenver.edu
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Systems Biology for Studies of Cognition in Down SyndromeR01HD056235 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GARDINER, KATHELEEN · 2008 to 2012
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD056235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intellectual disability in Down syndrome (DS) ranges from low normal to severely impaired and has a significant impact on the quality-of-life of the individuals affected and their families. Because the incidence of DS remains at approximately 1 in 700 live births and the lifespan is now >50 years, development of pharmacotherapies for cognitive deficits is an important goal. DS is due to an extra copy of human chromosome 21 and has often been considered too complex a genetic abnormality to be amenable to intervention. However, recent successes in rescuing learning/memory impairments in a mouse model of DS suggest that this negative outlook may not be justified. In this contribution, we first review the DS phenotype, chromosome 21 gene content and mouse models. We then discuss recent successes and the remaining challenges in the identification of targets for and preclinical evaluation of potential therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD24 AntigenCognition DisordersDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeHumansMiceOxidative StressPhenotypeReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCD24 AntigenCd24a protein, mouseReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID19963286
PMCPMC2815198
OpenAlexW1988320476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.