Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19962879›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2010

The ups and downs of Myc biology.

Laura Soucek, Gerard I Evan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The FGF/FGFR/c-Myc axis as a promising therapeutic target in multiple myeloma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Lessons in aging from Myc knockout mouse models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anti-cancer peptide-based therapeutic strategies in solid tumors.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2022
    Article
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura SoucekDepartment of Pathology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0502, USA. laura.soucek@ucsf.edu
Gerard I Evan
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Kinetic Analysis of Myc-induced carcinogenesis in vivoR01CA098018 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EVAN, GERARD IAN · 2003 to 2012
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basic helix-loop-helix protein Myc is a renowned transcription factor controlling disparate aspects of cell physiology that, together, allow efficient proliferation of somatic cells. This ability, together with the observation that its deregulated expression occurs in the majority of human cancers, suggests that Myc could be a good therapeutic target. However, several aspects of Myc biology remain elusive: what is the major difference between oncogenic and physiological Myc? How does oncogenic Myc evade the intrinsic tumor surveillance pathways provided by evolution? If Myc inhibition were even possible, what would be the consequences for the homeostasis of normal proliferating tissues versus the fate of cancer cells? Here we summarize the latest works addressing these issues.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell ProliferationDrug Delivery SystemsGene Expression RegulationHumansNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID19962879
PMCPMC2822095
OpenAlexW2057319734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.