Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19962715›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative pathology2010

Methusaleh's Zoo: how nature provides us with clues for extending human health span.

S N Austad

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular evolution of animal aging.The EMBO journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sex differences in DNA methylation in bats.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Extensive longevity and DNA virus-driven adaptation in nearcticbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bats as instructive animal models for studying longevity and aging.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S N AustadUniversity of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, 15355 Lambda Drive, STCBM Rm. 3.100, San Antonio, TX 78245, USA. austad@uthscsa.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Comparative Mechanisms of Exceptionally Slow AgingR01AG022873 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI AUSTAD, STEVEN N. · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
San Antonio Comparative Biology of Aging CenterK07AG025063 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI AUSTAD, STEVEN N. · 2004 to 2008
$540k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG025063NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As impressive as the accomplishments of modern molecular biologists have been in finding genetic alterations that lengthen life in short-lived model organisms, they pale in comparison to the remarkable diversity of lifespans produced by evolution. Some animal species are now firmly documented to live for more than four centuries and even some mammals, like the bowhead whale, appear to survive 200 years or more. Another group of species may not be as absolutely long-lived, but they are remarkably long-lived for their body size and metabolic rate. These species include a number of bats, some of which live for at least 40 years in the wild, as well as the naked mole-rat, which is the same size, but lives nearly 10 times as long as the laboratory mouse. Together these exceptionally long-lived organisms have important roles to play in our future understanding of the causal mechanisms and modulation of ageing. Bats and naked mole-rats in particular have already contributed in the following ways: (1) they have contributed to the abandonment of the rate-of-living theory and weakened enthusiasm for the oxidative stress hypothesis of ageing, (2) they have helped evaluate how the tumour-suppressing role of cellular senescence is affected by the evolution of diverse body sizes as well as diverse longevities, (3) they have shed light on the relationship between specific types of DNA repair and ageing and (4) they have yielded insight into new processes, specifically the maintenance of the proteome and hypotheses concerning how evolution shapes ageing. The continuing acceleration of progress in genome sequencing and development of more and more cross-species investigatory techniques will facilitate even more contributions of these species in the near future.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyAgingAnimalsBasal MetabolismCellular SenescenceChiropteraEnergy MetabolismHumansLongevityMole RatsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19962715
PMCPMC3535457
OpenAlexW1965713319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.