Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19962573›Full record

ReviewTransfusion medicine reviews2010

In vitro megakaryocyte production and platelet biogenesis: state of the art.

Jo-Anna Reems, Nicolas Pineault, Sijie Sun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion medicine reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Megakaryocytes as immune cells.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jo-Anna ReemsPuget Sound Blood Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. joannar@psbc.org
Nicolas Pineault
Sijie Sun
Bloodworks Northwest · USHéma-Québec · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

T-CELL IMMUNE RESPONSES TO FACTOR VIIIP50HL081015 · NHLBI · PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER · PI SLICHTER, SHERRILL J. · 2005 to 2009
$10.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL081015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exciting and extraordinary capabilities of stem cells to proliferate and differentiate into numerous cell types not only offers promises for changing how diseases are treated but may also impact how transfusion medicine may be practiced in the future. The possibility of growing platelets in the laboratory to some day supplement and/or replace standard platelet products has clear advantages for blood centers and patients. Because of the high utilization of platelets by patients undergoing chemotherapy or receiving stem cell transplants, platelet transfusions have steadily increased over the past decades. This trend is likely to continue as the number of adult and pediatric patients receiving stem cell transplants is also continuously rising. As a result of increased demand, coupled with the short shelf-life of platelet concentrates, providing platelets to patients can stretch the resources of most blood centers and drive donor recruitment efforts, and on occasion, platelet shortages can compromise the care of thrombocytopenic patients.

Indexed as

ThrombopoiesisCell Culture TechniquesHumansMegakaryocytesPlatelet Transfusion

Identifiers

PMID19962573
PMCPMC2790431
OpenAlexW2041937458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.