Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19961918›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances

Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins.

Reynald Tremblay, David Wang, Anthony M Jevnikar, Shengwu Ma

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Heterologous Expression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genetic Containment for Molecular Farming.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plant-Based Systems for Vaccine Production.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Reynald TremblayDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
David Wang
Anthony M Jevnikar
Shengwu Ma
Western University · CALawson Health Research Institute · CAPrinceton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular farming of pharmaceuticals in plants has the potential to provide almost unlimited amounts of recombinant proteins for use in disease diagnosis, prevention or treatment. Tobacco has been and will continue to be a major crop for molecular farming and offers several practical advantages over other crops. It produces significant leaf biomass, has high soluble protein content and is a non-food crop, minimizing the risk of food-chain contamination. This, combined with its flexibility and highly-efficient genetic transformation/regeneration, has made tobacco particularly well suited for plant-based production of biopharmaceutical products. The goal of this review is to provide an update on the use of tobacco for molecular farming of biopharmaceuticals as well the technologies developed to enhance protein production/purification/efficacy. We show that tobacco is a robust biological reactor with a multitude of applications and may hold the key to success in plant molecular farming.

Indexed as

BioreactorsAutoantigensDrug and Narcotic ControlImmune ToleranceNicotianaRecombinant ProteinsAutoantigensRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19961918
PMCPMC7132750
OpenAlexW1999615285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.