Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19961614›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2009

Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures.

Stefano Batacchi, Stefania Matano, Alessandra Nella, Giovanni Zagli, Manuela Bonizzoli, Andrea Pasquini, Valentina Anichini, Valentina Tucci, Giuseppe Manca, Kevin Ban and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Open abdomen in the trauma ICU patient: who? when? why? and what are the outcome results?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of negative-pressure therapy with and without ropivacaine instillation in the early evolution of severe peritonitis in pigs.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. An open and closed case: timing of closure following laparostomy.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Surgical site infections after parotidectomy: management and benefits of an antibiotic prophylaxis protocol.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano BatacchiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of Emergency Department, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50139, Florence, Italy. sbatac@tin.it
Stefania Matano
Alessandra Nella
Giovanni Zagli
Manuela Bonizzoli
Andrea Pasquini
Valentina Anichini
Valentina Tucci
Giuseppe Manca
Kevin Ban
Andrea Valeri
Adriano Peris
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritically ill surgical patients frequently develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) leading to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with subsequent high mortality. We compared two temporary abdominal closure systems (Bogota bag and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device) in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) control.

methodsThis prospective study with a historical control included 66 patients admitted to a medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care referral center (Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy) from January 2006 to April 2009. The control group included patients consecutively treated with the Bogota bag (Jan 2006-Oct 2007), whereas the prospective group was comprised of patients treated with a VAC. All patients underwent abdominal decompressive surgery. Groups were compared based upon their IAP, SOFA score, serial arterial lactates, the duration of having their abdomen open, the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) along with length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality. Data were collected from the time of abdominal decompression until the end of pressure monitoring.

resultsThe Bogota and VAC groups were similar with regards to demography, admission diagnosis, severity of illness, and IAH grading. The VAC system was more effective in controlling IAP (P < 0.01) and normalizing serum lactates (P < 0.001) as compared to the Bogota bag during the first 24 hours after surgical decompression. There was no significant difference between the SOFA scores. When compared to the Bogota, the VAC group had a faster abdominal closure time (4.4 vs 6.6 days, P = 0.025), shorter duration of MV (7.1 vs 9.9 days, P = 0.039), decreased ICU length of stay (LOS) (13.3 vs 19.2 days, P = 0.024) and hospital LOS (28.5 vs 34.9 days; P = 0.019). Mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups.

conclusionsPatients with abdominal compartment syndrome who were treated with VAC decompression had a faster abdominal closure rate and earlier discharge from the ICU as compared to similar patients treated with the Bogota bag.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAbdominal CavityAgedAPACHEDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansHypertensionIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID19961614
PMCPMC2811940
OpenAlexW2034401224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.