Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19960133›Full record

Trial reportThe Canadian journal of cardiology2009

Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing pharmacological reperfusion: a Canadian analysis of the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 trial.

Rober C Welsh, Luc Sauriol, Zugui Zhang, Paul Kolm, Willian S Weintraub, Pierre Theroux

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rober C WelshUniversity of Alberta and Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, Canada. rwelsh@cha.ab.ca
Luc Sauriol
Zugui Zhang
Paul Kolm
Willian S Weintraub
Pierre Theroux
Christiana Care Health System · USMontreal Heart Institute · CASanofi (Canada) · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in conjunction with fibrinolysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients within Canada.

designBased on the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ExTRACT-TIMI) 25 trial, a model was created to analyze the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in conjunction with fibrinolysis among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients within Canada. Clinical outcomes were derived from published results of the main trial. Resource use costs were first assessed based on United States Diagnosis-Related Group values for hospitalizations and Current Procedural Terminology codes for outpatient visits and tests. Both were then converted using Canadian local costs. Survival and life expectancy were estimated from Framingham survival data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed as cost per life year gained.

resultsThrough 30 days after random assignment, the primary composite end point favoured the enoxaparin group over the unfractionated heparin group (death or recurrent myocardial infarction rate 9.9% versus 12.0%, P<0.001), and was associated with a modest increased cost of $169.50 ($8,757.00 versus $8,587.50, respectively). Life years gained as a result of treatment with enoxaparin was increased by 0.11 years (P<0.05). Enoxaparin was found to be cost-effective, as indicated by an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4,930 with a 99% probability of costing less than $20,000.

conclusionsAlthough associated with modest increased direct medication costs, enoxaparin following fibrinolysis improved the clinical efficacy in STEMI patients and increased the life years gained.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsCanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodEnoxaparinFemaleFibrinolysisHealth Care CostsHeparinHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsEnoxaparinHeparin

Identifiers

PMID19960133
PMCPMC2807835
OpenAlexW2116594025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.