Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19960079›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2009

Web 2.0 and pharmacy education.

Jeff Cain, Brent I Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of E-learning in pharmacy education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Scholarly Merit of Social Media Use Among Clinical Faculty.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Using Facebook as an informal learning environment.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011
    Article
  16. Educational technology use among US colleges and schools of pharmacy.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Authors disagree with characterization of web 2.0 article.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010
    Article
  19. Wikis and open-access education?American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeff CainUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, KY, USA.
Brent I Fox

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New types of social Internet applications (often referred to as Web 2.0) are becoming increasingly popular within higher education environments. Although developed primarily for entertainment and social communication within the general population, applications such as blogs, social video sites, and virtual worlds are being adopted by higher education institutions. These newer applications differ from standard Web sites in that they involve the users in creating and distributing information, hence effectively changing how the Web is used for knowledge generation and dispersion. Although Web 2.0 applications offer exciting new ways to teach, they should not be the core of instructional planning, but rather selected only after learning objectives and instructional strategies have been identified. This paper provides an overview of prominent Web 2.0 applications, explains how they are being used within education environments, and elaborates on some of the potential opportunities and challenges that these applications present.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, PharmacyInternetStudents, PharmacyBloggingCommunicationCurriculumHumansInformation DisseminationLearningSocial SupportVideo GamesVideo RecordingWebcasts as TopicInternetlearningtechnologyWeb 2.0

Identifiers

PMID19960079
PMCPMC2779632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.