Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19960065›Full record

ArticleApplied magnetic resonance2010

Is Mn-Bound Substrate Water Protonated in the S(2) State of Photosystem II?

Ji-Hu Su, Johannes Messinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied magnetic resonance, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji-Hu Su
Johannes Messinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of great progress in resolving the geometric structure of the water-splitting Mn(4)O(x)Ca cluster in photosystem II, the binding sites and modes of the two substrate water molecules are still insufficiently characterized. While time-resolved membrane-inlet mass spectrometry measurements indicate that both substrate water molecules are bound to the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) in the S(2) and S(3) states (Hendry and Wydrzynski in Biochemistry 41:13328-13334, 2002), it is not known (1) if they are both Mn-bound, (2) if they are terminal or bridging ligands, and (3) in what protonation state they are bound in the different oxidation states S(i) (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) of the OEC. By employing (17)O hyperfine sublevel correlation (HYSCORE) spectroscopy we recently demonstrated that in the S(2) state there is only one (type of) Mn-bound oxygen that is water exchangeable. We therefore tentatively identified this oxygen as one substrate 'water' molecule, and on the basis of the finding that it has a hyperfine interaction of about 10 MHz with the electron spin of the Mn(4)O(x)Ca cluster, we suggest that it is bound as a Mn-O-Mn bridge within a bis-mu(2) oxo-bridged unit (Su et al. in J Am Chem Soc 130:786-787, 2008). Employing pulse electron paramagnetic resonance, (1)H/(2)H Mims electron-nuclear double resonance and (2)H-HYSCORE spectroscopies together with (1)H/(2)H-exchange here, we test this hypothesis by probing the protonation state of this exchangeable oxygen. We conclude that this oxygen is fully deprotonated. This result is discussed in the light of earlier reports in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID19960065
PMCPMC2784071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.