ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical haematology2009
Role of reduced intensity transplant in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: If and when?
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignancies.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although allogeneic transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the high risk of the ablative regimen limits its use, especially in older patients where the need for better therapy is greatest. Recent observations suggesting that a donor derived graft vs leukemia effect is important is facilitating cure after an allogeneic transplant has kindled interest in utilizing a reduced-intensity approach, which relies in large part on this effect to control and cure the disease. Several trials have now been reported that suggest that a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) approach might be very effective, especially in patients who are in the first remission of the disease from either related, unrelated, or cord blood transplant donors, with approximately 50% of patients alive and in remission two years after transplant. These studies suggest that prospective studies of RIC should be conducted in patients with ALL in first remission who are at high risk for relapse based on age or comorbidity to determine its role in the overall management of adult patients with this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.