ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2010
Validating pathophysiological models of aging using clinical electronic medical records.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of an algorithm that determines stroke diagnostic code accuracy in a Japanese hospital-based cancer registry using electronic medical records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Predicting age by mining electronic medical records with deep learning characterizes differences between chronological and physiological age.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Assessing the Collective Population Representativeness of Related Type 2 Diabetes Trials by Combining Public Data from ClinicalTrials.gov and NHANES.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2015Article
- Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013Article
- Latent physiological factors of complex human diseases revealed by independent component analysis of clinarrays.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Current methodologies for translational bioinformatics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioinformatics methods that leverage the vast amounts of clinical data promises to provide insights into underlying molecular mechanisms that help explain human physiological processes. One of these processes is adolescent development. The utility of predictive aging models generated from cross-sectional cohorts and their applicability to separate populations, including the clinical population, has yet to be completely explored. In order to address this, we built regression models predictive of adolescent chronological age from 2001 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data and validated them against independent 2003-2004 NHANES data and clinical data from an academic tertiary-care pediatric hospital. The results indicate distinct differences between male and female models with both alkaline phosphatase and creatinine as predictive biomarkers for both genders, hematocrit and mean cell volume for males, and total serum globulin for females. We also suggest that the models are generalizable, are clinically relevant, and imply underlying molecular and clinical differences between males and females that may affect prediction accuracy. The integration of both epidemiological and clinical data promises to create more robust models that shed new light on physiological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.