Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19958062›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2009

Early diagnosis of cancer--the role of general practice.

Peter Vedsted, Frede Olesen

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Atencion primaria · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patients with cancer and change of general practice: a Danish population-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Presenting symptoms of children with cancer: a primary-care population-based study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Patients' confidence in their GP before and after being diagnosed with cancer.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  20. A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter Vedsted
Frede Olesen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFamily PracticeClinical CompetenceHumansNeoplasmsPhysician's RolePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID19958062
PMCPMC3413909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.