ReviewCNS drugs2009
Migraine and functional impairment.
Review in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specific pre-injury migraine characteristics associated with worse concussion outcomes.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Study of the Effect of Treatment On the Clinical Profile, Pain, and Disability in Migraine Patients Seen in a Tertiary Hospital.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Association of increased pain intensity, daytime sleepiness, poor sleep quality, and quality of life with mobile phone overuse in patients with migraine: A multicenter, cross-sectional comparative study.Brain and behavior · 2022Observational
- The Impact of Migraine Disease on Work Productivity and Quality of Life Among the Adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2022Article
- Hypervigilance, Allostatic Load, and Migraine Prevention: Antibodies to CGRP or Receptor.Neurology and therapy · 2021Review
- Quality of Life and Disability Among Migraine Patients: A Single-Center Study in AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2021Article
- United States Patients' Perspective of Living With Migraine: Country-Specific Results From the Global "My Migraine Voice" Survey.Headache · 2020Article
- Content validity of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient-reported outcome.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2019Article
- Development and exploration of the content validity of a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the impact of migraine- the migraine physical function impact diary (MPFID).Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Article
- Measuring the impact of migraine for evaluating outcomes of preventive treatments for migraine headaches.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2016Article
- Taking the headache out of migraine.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2015Article
- Quality of life and migraine disability among female migraine patients in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution: a review of its use in patients with acute migraine.CNS drugs · 2014Review
- Why pharmacokinetic differences among oral triptans have little clinical importance: a comment.The journal of headache and pain · 2011Review
- Heuristic evaluation and usability testing of a computerized patient-reported outcomes survey for headache sufferers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide; approximately half of those affected have such severe attacks that they cannot function normally in routine daily activities. Research is beginning to focus upon the burden of migraine between attacks, referred to as interictal burden. This burden encompasses worry and expectation of future attacks that consequently may be associated with limitations in social and family interactions, as well as work capacity. This review aims to increase physician awareness of the degree and scope of functional impairment associated with migraine. Physicians are in a position to assess the true impact of migraine in their patients using techniques such as open-ended questions during visits, and paper-based migraine assessment tools such as the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire. Eliciting such information on interictal burden may help the physician prescribe the most appropriate therapy based on their patients' degree of impairment. This article also describes the instruments most widely used for measuring migraine-related functional impairment, summarizes studies assessing the effects of migraine on indicators of health-related quality of life and presents data on how preventive migraine treatment may beneficially influence migraine-related functional impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19958041What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.