Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19957087›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010

Effects of pentaerythritol tetranitrate on endothelial function in coronary artery disease: results of the PENTA study.

Boris Schnorbus, Robert Schiewe, Mir Abolfazl Ostad, Christoph Medler, Daniel Wachtlin, Philip Wenzel, Andreas Daiber, Thomas Münzel, Ascan Warnholtz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Chronic protection against ischemia and reperfusion-induced endothelial dysfunction during therapy with different organic nitrates.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris SchnorbusDepartment of Medicine II, Mainz University Medical Center, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Robert Schiewe
Mir Abolfazl Ostad
Christoph Medler
Daniel Wachtlin
Philip Wenzel
Andreas Daiber
Thomas Münzel
Ascan Warnholtz
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) differs from other organic nitrates by the lack of tolerance induction and by antioxidative properties. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PETN on endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We hypothesized that the treatment with PETN improves endothelial function in patients with CAD.

methodsIn a prospective, double-blind study, we randomly assigned 80 patients to treatment for 8 weeks with oral PETN 80 mg t.i.d. (PETN) or placebo (C). The primary endpoint was the absolute change in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) from baseline to follow-up. Furthermore, changes in nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD), digital peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) index, vascular shear stress, mean flow velocity, plasma bilirubin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), serum ferritin, and the activity of the PETN bioactivating enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH-2) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed. Raw data entry, data monitoring and statistical analysis were performed independently.

resultsThe treatment groups were comparable regarding demographics, cardiovascular risk and concomitant medication. There was no difference in the change in FMD between the two treatment groups (mean +/- SD: PETN: +1.6 +/- 3.3% vs. C: +1.4 +/- 4.1%; P = 0.7). NMD increased after treatment with PETN and was higher compared with C (PETN: +3.8 +/- 5.5% vs. C: +0.6 +/- 4.2%; P = 0.004). Mean PAT index and ALDH-2 activity remained unchanged. Relative changes in mean flow volume (P = 0.04) and mean flow velocity (P = 0.01) upon ischemia increased in the PETN group versus C. Changes in bilirubin, ferritin, TBARS and CRP did not differ between the groups.

conclusionsWe conclude that chronic PETN therapy in patients with CAD may be established for symptomatic treatment without adverse effects on endothelial function and with beneficial effects on the microcirculation.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPentaerythritol TetranitrateTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsPentaerythritol TetranitrateVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID19957087
OpenAlexW2019148514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.