Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956980›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2011

Efficacy and safety of intravenous voriconazole and intravenous itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Gloria N Mattiuzzi, Jorge Cortes, Gladys Alvarado, Srdan Verstovsek, Charles Koller, Sherry Pierce, Deborah Blamble, Stefan Faderl, Lianchun Xiao, Mike Hernandez and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Invasive Aspergillosis in Children: Update on Current Guidelines.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Therapeutic drug monitoring for triazoles: A needs assessment review and recommendations from a Canadian perspective.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gloria N MattiuzziDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 428, Houston, TX 77030, USA. gmattiuz@mdanderson.org
Jorge Cortes
Gladys Alvarado
Srdan Verstovsek
Charles Koller
Sherry Pierce
Deborah Blamble
Stefan Faderl
Lianchun Xiao
Mike Hernandez
Hagop Kantarjian
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of voriconazole with itraconazole as prophylaxis in leukemia patients.

methodsOpen-label, randomized study. Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing induction chemotherapy or first salvage were eligible. Patients received voriconazole (400 mg intravenous (i.v.) every 12 h for two doses, followed by 300 mg BID) or itraconazole (200 mg i.v. twice daily for 2 days, followed by 200 mg i.v. daily).

resultsA total of 127 patients were enrolled. Four were excluded because they did not receive study drug (n=3) or received two antifungal agents during the first week on study (n =1), leaving 123 patients for analysis. None of the 71 patients receiving voriconazole developed proven or probable invasive fungal infection, compared to two (4%) of the 52 patients receiving itraconazole (P=0.17). Drug discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 15 patients (21%) receiving voriconazole and six (11%) receiving itraconazole (P=0.23).

conclusionsVoriconazole is a good alternative for prophylaxis in patients with leukemia. Elevated baseline bilirubin levels were associated with a higher risk of side effects in patients receiving i.v. voriconazole or i.v. itraconazole. Monitoring of liver function and drug levels should be considered for some patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBilirubinDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousItraconazoleLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMycosesMyelodysplastic SyndromesAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBilirubinItraconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID19956980
OpenAlexW2060356713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.