Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956792›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2009

Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries.

Michael Parker, Susan J Bull, Jantina de Vries, Tsiri Agbenyega, Ogobara K Doumbo, Dominic P Kwiatkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Health Research Ethics in Southern Africa: Building Capacity and Cultivating Excellence.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An open dataset ofWellcome open research · 2021
    Article
  13. Data Access Committees.BMC medical ethics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "You want the right amount of oversight": interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael ParkerEthox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. michael.parker@ethox.ox.ac.uk
Susan J Bull
Jantina de Vries
Tsiri Agbenyega
Ogobara K Doumbo
Dominic P Kwiatkowski

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600230Medical Research Council G0600718Medical Research Council G19/9PHS HHS 566Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 077383/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 087285/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEthics, ResearchGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInformation DisseminationInternational CooperationPublic Policy

Identifiers

PMID19956792
PMCPMC2771895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.