Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19956610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Structural plasticity can produce metaplasticity.

Georgios Kalantzis, Harel Z Shouval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive control of synaptic plasticity integrates micro- and macroscopic network function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional consequences of pre- and postsynaptic expression of synaptic plasticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Mechanisms of heterosynaptic metaplasticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  12. Evidence for metaplasticity in the human visual cortex.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dendritic spine dynamics regulate the long-term stability of synaptic plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Georgios KalantzisDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America. kalantzi@bcm.edu
Harel Z Shouval

Funding

Neural Models of Plasticity: Molecules to NetworksP01NS038310 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BYRNE, JOHN H · 1999 to 2009
$9.3M
NINDS NIH HHS 2 P01- NS038310-06A2NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS038310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSynaptic plasticity underlies many aspect of learning memory and development. The properties of synaptic plasticity can change as a function of previous plasticity and previous activation of synapses, a phenomenon called metaplasticity. Synaptic plasticity not only changes the functional connectivity between neurons but in some cases produces a structural change in synaptic spines; a change thought to form a basis for this observed plasticity. Here we examine to what extent structural plasticity of spines can be a cause for metaplasticity. This study is motivated by the observation that structural changes in spines are likely to affect the calcium dynamics in spines. Since calcium dynamics determine the sign and magnitude of synaptic plasticity, it is likely that structural plasticity will alter the properties of synaptic plasticity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study we address the question how spine geometry and alterations of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors conductance may affect plasticity. Based on a simplified model of the spine in combination with a calcium-dependent plasticity rule, we demonstrated that after the induction phase of plasticity a shift of the long term potentiation (LTP) or long term depression (LTD) threshold takes place. This induces a refractory period for further LTP induction and promotes depotentiation as observed experimentally. That resembles the BCM metaplasticity rule but specific for the individual synapse. In the second phase, alteration of the NMDA response may bring the synapse to a state such that further synaptic weight alterations are feasible. We show that if the enhancement of the NMDA response is proportional to the area of the post synaptic density (PSD) the plasticity curves most likely return to the initial state. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using simulations of calcium dynamics in synaptic spines, coupled with a biophysically motivated calcium-dependent plasticity rule, we find under what conditions structural plasticity can form the basis of synapse specific metaplasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumDiffusionExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsLong-Term PotentiationModels, BiologicalModels, NeurologicalModels, TheoreticalNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, GABAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSoftwareSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionCalciumReceptors, GABAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID19956610
PMCPMC2779489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.