ArticlePloS one2009
Scalable steady state analysis of Boolean biological regulatory networks.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Logical computation with self-assembling electric circuits.PloS one · 2022Article
- An Algorithm for Finding the Singleton Attractors and Pre-Images in Strong-Inhibition Boolean Networks.PloS one · 2016Article
- ASP-G: an ASP-based method for finding attractors in genetic regulatory networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Composing problem solvers for simulation experimentation: a case study on steady state estimation.PloS one · 2014Article
- Detection of attractors of large Boolean networks via exhaustive enumeration of appropriate subspaces of the state space.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- NeuroDNet - an open source platform for constructing and analyzing neurodegenerative disease networks.BMC neuroscience · 2013Article
- An efficient algorithm for computing attractors of synchronous and asynchronous Boolean networks.PloS one · 2013Article
- Digital clocks: simple Boolean models can quantitatively describe circadian systems.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2012Article
- Integrated systems view on networking by hormones in Arabidopsis immunity reveals multiple crosstalk for cytokinin.The Plant cell · 2012Article
- SubMAP: aligning metabolic pathways with subnetwork mappings.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2011Article
- A network model for plant-pollinator community assembly.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputing the long term behavior of regulatory and signaling networks is critical in understanding how biological functions take place in organisms. Steady states of these networks determine the activity levels of individual entities in the long run. Identifying all the steady states of these networks is difficult due to the state space explosion problem. METHODOLOGY: In this paper, we propose a method for identifying all the steady states of Boolean regulatory and signaling networks accurately and efficiently. We build a mathematical model that allows pruning a large portion of the state space quickly without causing any false dismissals. For the remaining state space, which is typically very small compared to the whole state space, we develop a randomized traversal method that extracts the steady states. We estimate the number of steady states, and the expected behavior of individual genes and gene pairs in steady states in an online fashion. Also, we formulate a stopping criterion that terminates the traversal as soon as user supplied percentage of the results are returned with high confidence.
conclusionsThis method identifies the observed steady states of boolean biological networks computationally. Our algorithm successfully reported the G1 phases of both budding and fission yeast cell cycles. Besides, the experiments suggest that this method is useful in identifying co-expressed genes as well. By analyzing the steady state profile of Hedgehog network, we were able to find the highly co-expressed gene pair GL1-SMO together with other such pairs. AVAILABILITY: Source code of this work is available at http://bioinformatics.cise.ufl.edu/palSteady.html twocolumnfalse].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.