ArticlePloS one2009
Examination of genome homogeneity in prokaryotes using genomic signatures.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compression rates of microbial genomes are associated with genome size and base composition.Genomics & informatics · 2024Article
- Genomic Signature in Evolutionary Biology: A Review.Biology · 2023Review
- A simple stochastic model describing the evolution of genomic GC content in asexually reproducing organisms.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Classification of COVID-19 and Other Pathogenic Sequences: A Dinucleotide Frequency and Machine Learning Approach.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- Insights from the complete genome sequence of Clostridium tyrobutyricum provide a platform for biotechnological and industrial applications.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2017Article
- The nucleotide composition of microbial genomes indicates differential patterns of selection on core and accessory genomes.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Phylogenomic Analysis of Oenococcus oeni Reveals Specific Domestication of Strains to Cider and Wines.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Microbial genomic taxonomy.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Article
- Relative entropy differences in bacterial chromosomes, plasmids, phages and genomic islands.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- A quantitative account of genomic island acquisitions in prokaryotes.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Across bacterial phyla, distantly-related genomes with similar genomic GC content have similar patterns of amino acid usage.PloS one · 2011Article
- Stoichiogenomics: the evolutionary ecology of macromolecular elemental composition.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2011Review
- Natural selection retains overrepresented out-of-frame stop codons against frameshift peptides in prokaryotes.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Genomic comparisons of Brucella spp. and closely related bacteria using base compositional and proteome based methods.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA word frequencies, normalized for genomic AT content, are remarkably stable within prokaryotic genomes and are therefore said to reflect a "genomic signature." The genomic signatures can be used to phylogenetically classify organisms from arbitrary sampled DNA. Genomic signatures can also be used to search for horizontally transferred DNA or DNA regions subjected to special selection forces. Thus, the stability of the genomic signature can be used as a measure of genomic homogeneity. The factors associated with the stability of the genomic signatures are not known, and this motivated us to investigate further. We analyzed the intra-genomic variance of genomic signatures based on AT content normalization (0(th) order Markov model) as well as genomic signatures normalized by smaller DNA words (1(st) and 2(nd) order Markov models) for 636 sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Regression models were fitted, with intra-genomic signature variance as the response variable, to a set of factors representing genomic properties such as genomic AT content, genome size, habitat, phylum, oxygen requirement, optimal growth temperature and oligonucleotide usage variance (OUV, a measure of oligonucleotide usage bias), measured as the variance between genomic tetranucleotide frequencies and Markov chain approximated tetranucleotide frequencies, as predictors. PRINCIPAL
findingsRegression analysis revealed that OUV was the most important factor (p<0.001) determining intra-genomic homogeneity as measured using genomic signatures. This means that the less random the oligonucleotide usage is in the sense of higher OUV, the more homogeneous the genome is in terms of the genomic signature. The other factors influencing variance in the genomic signature (p<0.001) were genomic AT content, phylum and oxygen requirement.
conclusionsGenomic homogeneity in prokaryotes is intimately linked to genomic GC content, oligonucleotide usage bias (OUV) and aerobiosis, while oligonucleotide usage bias (OUV) is associated with genomic GC content, aerobiosis and habitat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.